Type to search


Nepal Investment Bank wins legal case on guarantee payment of Rs 2.1 billion against Italian counterpart

Nepal Investment Bank wins legal case on guarantee payment of Rs 2.1 billion against Italian counterpart

Release of the cost a serious monetary reprieve for the Nepali business financial institution that will in any other case require enormous provisioning for losses

KATHMU, June 9:  In what seems to be a giant monetary reduction for Nepal Investment Bank Ltd (NIBL), the business financial institution stated it has received a authorized battle in an Italian court docket to safe counter-guarantee cost of practically Rs 2.1 billion from its Italian counterpart Intesa Sanpaolo SPA in relation to Tanahu Hydropower Ltd.

NIBL— one of many largest business banks of Nepal — was combating a authorized battle in Italy for over a 12 months after the Italian financial institution refused to compensate NIBL for the assure quantity it had paid to Tanahu Hydropower Ltd.  An area court docket in Italy on Tuesday quashed a authorized case stopping the Italian financial institution to make the counter assure cost to its Nepali counterpart, based on NIBL. A financial institution assure refers to a pledge that the financial institution will probably be liable if its shopper fails to meet its obligation.  

This ‘victory’ within the court docket launch of the cost additionally insulates NIBL from doable provisioning of 100 % of the losses by mid-July that would have dealt an enormous monetary blow within the present fiscal 12 months.  

The authorized case ensued after the Italian financial institution refused to compensate NIBL the cost of practically Rs 2.1 billion for the assure it had issued to Italian Cooperativa Muratori e Cementisti di Ravenna (CMC) for Tanahu Hydropower Ltd. Tanahu Hydropower Ltd claimed obtained the assure cost from NIBL after terminating the contract with the ailing Italian firm CMC over its dismal efficiency to construct Tanahu Hydropower Project. CMC is similar Italian contractor which had additionally aboned the Melamchi Water Supply Project final 12 months, throwing the much-awaited mega consuming water venture into chaos for months.  

While the financial institution paid the assure quantity to the hydropower firm, Intesa Sanpaolo, which had issued the counter assure value Rs 2.1 billion (Rs 851.42 million in Nepali rupees along with 8.75 million in Euro) on behalf of the CMC, declined to compensate the Nepali financial institution.

According to NIBL officers, the Italian financial institution turned down their request to launch the cost that that they had made to Tanahu Hydropower Ltd citing a keep order from Italy’s native court docket, Tribunale Di Bologna. Even within the subsequent hearings, the court docket had refused to revoke its keep order to make cost to NIBL. However, a full-bench of the identical court docket on Tuesday revoked its earlier keep order that had prevented the Italian financial institution to pay the financial institution assure quantity to NIBL.

The native court docket’s transfer elated the executives of NIBL which might have been required to make mortgage loss provisioning of over Rs 2 billion if it had not received the case. The mortgage loss provisioning of this magnitude means a severe blow to the financial institution its profitability.

“The court docket resolution to quash its earlier order has paved the authorized approach for us to assert the financial institution assure from the Italian financial institution. With the discharge of the cash, we might not be required to provision the losses by Asadh finish [mid July],” Jyoti Prakash Pey, the NIBL’s CEO, informed Republica Online. “This authorized victory can be useful for the nation as it’s also about receiving international forex,” he added.  

“Protection from loss provisioning provided that the cost is realized”

A senior official at Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB) informed Republica Online that the loss provisioning requirement will rely on the belief of the counter assure cost from the Italian financial institution.

“NIBL is not going to should provision the losses provided that the cost from the Italian financial institution is credited to its account,” stated a senior official on the Bank Supervision Department of the NRB, requesting anonymity as he was not approved to speak to the media. “If the cost is just not realized, the financial institution must provision 100 % losses,” he added.

In line with the instruction of the central financial institution, NIBL had already retained practically half of the cost assure quantity, or Rs 990 million, in a reserve fund. The assure cost quantity at the moment was decrease resulting from international change price.

According to a supply on the NRB, NIBL was requested to retain part of its revenue in its reserve fund to make it possible for it doesn’t should face monetary shock in case the court docket resolution doesn’t come within the financial institution’s favor. Had the financial institution misplaced the authorized battle within the Italian court docket, it must provision 100 % of the losses. The loss provisioning would have severely hit the financial institution’s revenue at a time when COVID-19 containment measures to cease the unfold of the coronavirus are going to place a stress on its stability sheet.  


You Might also Like

Leave a Reply