Type to search

amendment to Schedule 3 of the constitution Constitution amendment bill House of Representatives Kalapani Limpiyadhura Lipulekh Minister of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Nepal Nepal’s emblem News revised map of Nepal Shiva Maya Tumbahangphe

Amendment bill to update emblem tabled

Amendment bill to update emblem tabled


Minister of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Shiva Maya Tumbahangphe tabled the Constitution Amendment Bill (second modification) within the House of Representatives immediately looking for to replace Nepal’s emblem by together with the revised map of Nepal after amending Schedule three of the structure.

On May 20, the federal government had issued the brand new administrative and political map of the nation, depicting Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani as Nepal’s territories though India has administrative and political management over Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani and has counter declare over these territories.

The invoice must be handed by two-thirds members of the House of Representatives current on the day of voting to amend the structure.

Although the ruling Nepal Communist Party (NCP) is in need of two-thirds majority within the Parliament, the invoice is prone to be handed as the principle opposition Nepali Congress has determined to help it.

Senior Advocate Mithilesh Kumar Singh mentioned the invoice must full the method mandated by Article 274 (4) of the structure which meant that the federal government must search the consent of Sudurpaschim Province to include Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani in that province. He mentioned a discover must be despatched to Sudurpaschim Province inside 30 days in regards to the change within the boundary of the province.

“Our new map depicts Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani because the nation’s territories, however the map doesn’t present which native degree these territories belong to.

The authorities also needs to inform the Election Commission about these territories.

The authorities has not carried out census and it has not earmarked finances for these areas,” Singh added.

Parliament Secretariat Secretary Gopinath Yogi informed THT {that a} discover can be printed within the Nepal Gazette and Gorkhapatra tomorrow to tell the general public in regards to the presentation of the structure modification invoice within the HoR as per the House of Representatives Regulation. The HoR can’t transfer any course of on the structure modification invoice within the subsequent seven days. After seven days, the HoR can debate the ideas of the invoice earlier than giving 72 hours to lawmakers to current amendments in opposition to the provisions of the invoice, if any. If amendments are registered in opposition to the invoice, then there shall be a deliberation on the amendments; if not, dialogue will happen on the contents of the invoice.

According to Yogi, the invoice could possibly be put to vote immediately after lawmakers talk about it or a particular committee might be shaped earlier than the invoice is put to vote. Parliament Secretariat sources mentioned possibilities of forming a particular committee have been slim, as there was just one subject — the revision of map — for the modification.

Once the invoice is handed by the HoR, it could be despatched to the National Assembly, the place an identical course of can be adopted. Yogi mentioned the Upper House would be capable to instantly conduct different proceedings because the seven-days public discover course of would have been accomplished within the HoR.

Parliament sources mentioned that if each the homes needed to fast-track the passage time, they might accomplish that by suspending House guidelines. Spokesperson for the Parliament Secretariat Rojnath Pandey mentioned the House might shorten the time required to register amendments on the invoice’s provisions. The HoR might go the structure modification invoice after three to 4 House conferences. “But if the House decides to carry two to 3 conferences in in the future, then the invoice could possibly be handed inside days,” Pandey mentioned. He added that the invoice wouldn’t be determined by voice voting.

Lawmakers must put their signatures to help or oppose the invoice.

A model of this text seems in e-paper on June 1, 2020, of The Himalayan Times.



Leave a Reply